I have wanted to watch Life of Pi for a long while now. However, I have a copy of the book, so I
wanted to read the book first before I watch the movie. I talked to a friend and she definitely needed
to talk about the ending because she had seen it with a few people and they
were arguing about the ending.
So, I decided to watch the movie afterall, despite reading
the book. It was a great movie. I really liked it. I didn’t watch it 3D (even though she highly
recommended it) because it was cheaper not to.
It was a great movie. I highly recommend it for anyone who wants to see it. :)
****SPOILER ALERT****
So, the whole issue is the ending. Yes, there are two versions to the story and
apparently, depending on which one you choose, defines your
personality/beliefs. So, remember, in
the beginning, it is stated multiple times and highly emphasized that this is a
story that will make you believe in God. The problem with the ending is that in one
version, he is trapped on a boat with animals and all the animals die except
for the Bengal tiger (Ricahrd Parker), along
with the main character. However, in the
second version of the story, all the animals are actually human beings and the
human beings are the one killing each other and HE (the main character) is the
tiger. So I talked to my BF and he
thinks that it was the second story, where the people are actually humans and
my friend also thinks that this is the true story.
However, I disagreed; I thought that the first story was the
real one, the one with Richard Parker. And
she (my friend) actually gave me good feedback on why she thought this was
true. However, we did agree that the
ending that we chose is based on our perspective of the world and our
personality.
So, being the curious person I am, I went online to find out
more analysis on this movie.
I found a
great one by this guy
http://screenrant.com/life-of-pi-movie-ending-spoilers/.
This person was able to put everything
into words; something that I was unable to do.
However, long story short, he states that:
‘The real question is – which story do you, the
viewer/reader prefer? Interpretation is subjective but the question is intended
to serve as a moment of theological reflection. Are you a person that prefers
to believe in things that always make sense/things that you can see? Or are you
a person that prefers to believe in miracles/take things on faith? There are no
right or wrong answers – just an opportunity for introspection.’
‘…story is set up to help viewers/readers consider which
version of the world they prefer – the one where we make our own way and suffer
through the darkness via self-determination, or the one where we are aided by
something greater than ourselves (regardless of which version of “God” we may accept).’
I thought this was the perfect interpretation of how one can
interpret their selection of the ending.
So, tell me, what ending did you pick? Which did you prefer? Do you think it is an accurate interpretation
of your beliefs/personality?